| Re: [proaudio] Importing ladi overlay to proaudio overlay |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Importing ladi overlay to proaudio overlay
- From: Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:38:04 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g7g0e691WYmsboYMHbNp3bOU7PpVfJhpo/Sc9thbA/o=; b=n/9ebI44BEjHvW15c/X0O615FqZPp2RkXzD2HL7urZDkl16f6DMNtDQsEOI4Dy4UH9 fSlB5LpbQo1BUPs8wmlLl8JWHKKSsjjPGUPAjIDSGiAiHgyjjXnw+xmbxp5U/JAOR7St IxhCY4XxzzEfUV39f3+WZdIOy7tlsq0MyMtsxn/KhTAkLAa07WyFAFhxDQ4nOhIExyXi 1y2uskfrOXjtxSyK5ppqTI3nhIaW0gtKjTtbYnLd6104df5gGx//pUNqGarFiTPD5lUu 3J2ZTh3Zs0sSd5nspwD8Tb1nZkaUYIbXKKw5FVwO35UCfrdFPe+k8EAgLBwgv2H4y98E h+GQ==
Thanks for your answers so far! We will wait a little while until we
start the import just so everyone can have their say (in case someone
is on vacation due to Christmas).
Thanks Dominique for reporting the issues. They should both be fixed by now..
Regards,
Karl
2012/12/25 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Le Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:32:35 +0100,
> Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Me and Nedko Arnaudov have come up the idea of merging the ladi
>> overlay to the proaudio overlay. Both overlays aim at proaudio
>> production so we don't see a reason for having two overlays. This
>> import would also reduce the risk of doing duplicate work and is more
>> convenient as users don't need to download and keep track of two
>> overlays.
>>
>> What do you think? Would it be a good idea? If no one opposes the idea
>> we can start working immidiately.
>
>
> Yes, it is a good idea. I took a fast look, and a few things need to be
> fixed. First, laditools fail with
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
> "dev-python/pygobject[introspection]".
> !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request:
> - dev-python/pygobject-3.2.2-r1::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
> - dev-python/pygobject-3.2.2::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
> - dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6-r52::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
> (dependency required by "media-sound/laditools-1.0.1" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "laditools" [argument])
>
> Introspection support was removed from all gentoo pygobject due to
> upstream recommendation # (see
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642048#c9)
>
> I try to remove the introspection USE depend from laditools ebuild.
> emerge work, but the only program that work is ladi-system-tray. All
> the other programs are failing.
>
> Another error is the URI in dev-python/enum. It begin with mirror://
> This tell portage to search for the archive on the gentoo mirrors where
> this file is not. Should be replaced by http://
>
> Dominique
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Karl Lindén
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "We have the heroes we deserve."
>
>