Re: [proaudio] Importing ladi overlay to proaudio overlay |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Importing ladi overlay to proaudio overlay
- From: toki clover <tokiclover@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:12:30 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c66YIuEWCPUI8QJqFSk0OLw9Cm1Z/fleNQF1PF/5z6s=; b=Y4PjIr1Mrh7NPKOuTvp9VLfDGZtcL6Bd00dYPPnqw2EJdmFIOI0BRUZdrIqt9Q9vwZ +TqXotI0THG7ZDVf2dxgBVZ+Q52pQImUCNNt4rZLaP3mespegbV2M0G7DtiJlhxQ2PWk hMvQGRD0L1fYNmg/LJ2nqbPikrTc7mhzufERtL9RF4dNPJpVieiaTY/ojKZqIj1Ev3j9 KeoV0TbzEEG1KJ5aP48UXuXp1dt5YhObJV3G/tUwxZBh7i9GbrdwumyXPN40fDb27iB1 tWl9zY4eNmYoDJ0R6J0xfMX6FLPlrBsJB3aDJDtTphOcOKqzhp5qSZEvPa2zVssm+G1m ijEA==
I'd like to just add, again, that this is an occasion to migrate to
git. Many proaudio users, including myself, will contribute with a git
vcs instead of a subversion one. I created https://github.com/proaudio
a few weeks ago, but nobody seems to be interested into it. I'll
delete everything next time I have a chance to be logged as proaudio.
2012/12/25, Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Thanks for your answers so far! We will wait a little while until we
> start the import just so everyone can have their say (in case someone
> is on vacation due to Christmas).
>
> Thanks Dominique for reporting the issues. They should both be fixed by
> now.
>
> Regards,
> Karl
>
> 2012/12/25 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Le Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:32:35 +0100,
>> Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Me and Nedko Arnaudov have come up the idea of merging the ladi
>>> overlay to the proaudio overlay. Both overlays aim at proaudio
>>> production so we don't see a reason for having two overlays. This
>>> import would also reduce the risk of doing duplicate work and is more
>>> convenient as users don't need to download and keep track of two
>>> overlays.
>>>
>>> What do you think? Would it be a good idea? If no one opposes the idea
>>> we can start working immidiately.
>>
>>
>> Yes, it is a good idea. I took a fast look, and a few things need to be
>> fixed. First, laditools fail with
>>
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
>> "dev-python/pygobject[introspection]".
>> !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request:
>> - dev-python/pygobject-3.2.2-r1::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
>> - dev-python/pygobject-3.2.2::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
>> - dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6-r52::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
>> (dependency required by "media-sound/laditools-1.0.1" [ebuild])
>> (dependency required by "laditools" [argument])
>>
>> Introspection support was removed from all gentoo pygobject due to
>> upstream recommendation # (see
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642048#c9)
>>
>> I try to remove the introspection USE depend from laditools ebuild.
>> emerge work, but the only program that work is ladi-system-tray. All
>> the other programs are failing.
>>
>> Another error is the URI in dev-python/enum. It begin with mirror://
>> This tell portage to search for the archive on the gentoo mirrors where
>> this file is not. Should be replaced by http://
>>
>> Dominique
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Karl Lindén
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "We have the heroes we deserve."
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Error 404 citizen <xyz> was not found