Re: [proaudio] Importing ladi overlay to proaudio overlay

[Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Dominique for reporting it! It should be fixed by now.

Regarding the discussion about git or svn I also think it's another
issue, but I like the svn as it is because I find it easier and more
nifty to use.

Regards,
Karl

2012/12/27 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Le Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:38:04 +0100,
> Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for your answers so far! We will wait a little while until we
>> start the import just so everyone can have their say (in case someone
>> is on vacation due to Christmas).
>>
>> Thanks Dominique for reporting the issues. They should both be fixed
>> by now.
>
> It seam to work. But is is still a minor issue:
>
> Calculating dependencies / * A file is not listed in the Manifest:
> '/var/lib/layman/ladi/media-sound/jack-rack/jack-rack-1.4.8_rc1.ebuild'
>  * Missing digest for
>    '/var/lib/layman/ladi/media-sound/jack-rack/jack-rack-1.4.8_rc1.ebuild'
>
> Ciao,
> Dominique
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Karl
>>
>> 2012/12/25 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Le Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:32:35 +0100,
>> > Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> Me and Nedko Arnaudov have come up the idea of merging the ladi
>> >> overlay to the proaudio overlay. Both overlays aim at proaudio
>> >> production so we don't see a reason for having two overlays. This
>> >> import would also reduce the risk of doing duplicate work and is
>> >> more convenient as users don't need to download and keep track of
>> >> two overlays.
>> >>
>> >> What do you think? Would it be a good idea? If no one opposes the
>> >> idea we can start working immidiately.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, it is a good idea. I took a fast look, and a few things need
>> > to be fixed. First, laditools fail with
>> >
>> > emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
>> > "dev-python/pygobject[introspection]".
>> > !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your
>> > request:
>> > - dev-python/pygobject-3.2.2-r1::gentoo (Missing IUSE:
>> > introspection)
>> > - dev-python/pygobject-3.2.2::gentoo (Missing IUSE: introspection)
>> > - dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6-r52::gentoo (Missing IUSE:
>> > introspection) (dependency required by
>> > "media-sound/laditools-1.0.1" [ebuild]) (dependency required by
>> > "laditools" [argument])
>> >
>> > Introspection support was removed from all gentoo pygobject due to
>> > upstream recommendation # (see
>> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642048#c9)
>> >
>> > I try to remove the introspection USE depend from laditools ebuild.
>> > emerge work, but the only program that work is ladi-system-tray. All
>> > the other programs are failing.
>> >
>> > Another error is the URI in dev-python/enum. It begin with mirror://
>> > This tell portage to search for the archive on the gentoo mirrors
>> > where this file is not. Should be replaced by http://
>> >
>> > Dominique
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Karl Lindén
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > "We have the heroes we deserve."
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "We have the heroes we deserve."
>
>