| [proaudio] ck-sources vs. rt-sources |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [proaudio] ck-sources vs. rt-sources
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:12:01 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=A+I+3iBqq8HrsdILVl379ldPhE87xTdqq01yPOJ5pFqqpMuoOfJ14TFylxoXVx4DiYdbr4cUo4MNCpbgHvi3oj1rb4IzEK1fuADYtZ41KGhCJ96oodV0I0vTnyNumGZztVKW/4ifiOMKewRqH8V2Jf/lhBwzrx5XGbP3OMvkDms=
Hi,
I'm just wondering if anyone on this list has any experience with
ck-sources? How does it compare to rt-sources for usability with real
time audio.
Cheers,
Mark