| Re: [pok-devel] POK now executing at JP |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/pok-devel Archives
]
- To: pok-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [pok-devel] POK now executing at JP
- From: Laurent Lec <lec.laurent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:26:27 +0100
- Cc: "Reder, Leonard J (3496)" <Leonard.J.Reder@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e3F6S8P3HFskZadKKXV9tzK0rM6HN+K+v+pV1b14upA=; b=t6d63cHtzM/2GFVrRbqUnRgIKT8jBNXHA44k4K3wPoh2hMq6CY1J142g3glyLAtPBq Kst3KIgpA9WOmjt6HG0nnQmxP1/KuUDvCJ1LDrxFie/SEEflPG0lJWyWnZHXQd1KNJJk qOqVq8fTdZGbXqYKedPO21I/6fIsIUPhQALk8=
Leonard,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Reder, Leonard J (3496)
<Leonard.J.Reder@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "QEMU" => ["qemu", "qemu-system-x86_64", "i386-softmmu"],
Thanks for the tip!
> Also it seems that many of the examples are broken or just do not run on the
> x86 emulation for one reason or another. Is there a better version of POK
> with more functionality that I can download?
There should not be much difference between the last release and the
last SVN revision. Which examples are not running for instance? Most
of those listed in examples/Makefile should work.
> Oh yes from a previous question the target we would like to run POK on is
> the RAD750 3U Single Board Computer from BAE Systems in the U. S. However,
> I do not think this will be an easy task since POK does not support any
> device drivers at all so we would have to spend considerable time developing
> drivers.
POK currently supports x86, SPARC and PPC architectures. For any other
case, we need to port the architecture dependent code.
Cheers,
--
Laurent Lec