Re: [hatari-devel] DKIM/DMARC test |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] DKIM/DMARC test
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 19:45:17 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1751226319; bh=RSC7k9Ggg+Tce8NtLJRb6uNl7RLgxGg5LYrMJOOBzt8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=TReX23o3LMa8ExTgAFzGL5lWlYuEl5lfjNvonzLDl5UzwJtWUqo5V4PegtxsaxVzr KKJ28MqpCNrNY9jcSEp0qtQL8elNuYohRCRve8OzInKg9lt8SqWDH5BALMLZuDjc3F wK6EaNHdikfRv7bXSCCqSOlDytAV016yS+jognV/5QxpBxJVKin0rMcRswlWLagqRZ 1EgLryo3ClE5iP65zaGdPiaLF6QIW/hcHr7n+S75th+D7vOAhunzWhtUX3+GLwap5+ 9p8wt1DeIcd/hYJHHgCDYjqh/wIv8Aat7PsTJ8/m/RgB+oFwl+RjqeTzJvyNXuh0wy UhNIn7Qwa/8ow==
Am Sun, 29 Jun 2025 18:47:23 +0200
schrieb Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>:
> Christian Zietz schrieb:
>
> > I can check whether the provider's "To" rule
> > implicitly also covers "Cc", even though the documentation states otherwise.
>
> After testing, I can say, yes, GMX's filter rule applies to "Cc",
> despite this being explicitly stated otherwise in their documentation.
> Therefore, I could sort my emails using hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> as recipient (unless someone sends emails to the list in "Bcc").
>
> I still think the proposed change to the mail subject is not a good
> idea, as it will break things for more people than it fixes. For
> example, as already pointed out, Eero's delivery problems happened with
> emails where the subject was not modified anyway.
Ok, Roger also said that he's using the prefix for filtering, so you've
both convinced me now that we should rather keep the prefix.
Thomas