Re: [hatari-devel] DKIM/DMARC test |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] DKIM/DMARC test
- From: Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 20:18:08 +0300
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.dnamail.fi 41B002113E18
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helsinkinet.fi; s=2025-03; t=1751217489; bh=1BZM/f0+s7ezA1L1mRkg5DfBFS/RiO/gLcbqVMMHl5Q=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vp5homA9FaCUbuYHuu4QKhaDG0lYM8K/I2/yRv9Y7IvCijVd11lvcqlHJTh45dS0e x1IYis2+JgNH3YrY67QeflUBFhNk6jBMKheDiFj4LTDY+hP44NGBMJcW/pY9Y5M1gq n9S9+u9eCh7pdBQhUZtSeKfhhdUnfje1GTZJRNNrEuoeeSXLk9YLHv4KFO+UQ3TM30 cpoj0HeL1oGbkp6IX5uT4tJBUREHaoA1KAfmemscotYiLqSpxFLdYFmDpDXdwH2R3h h7CiTHLte/IhIc/fx6MoIFA3zioZA5gzTkPLggpfuK0DLTNQo5Y6DrGnrAVzP25dEQ qBztkWsi9sUfw==
Hi,
On 29.6.2025 19.47, Christian Zietz wrote:
Christian Zietz schrieb:
I can check whether the provider's "To" rule
implicitly also covers "Cc", even though the documentation states
otherwise.
After testing, I can say, yes, GMX's filter rule applies to "Cc",
despite this being explicitly stated otherwise in their documentation.
Can you file bugs against those docs?
(To get clarity whether docs are just out of date, or whether current
behavior is unsupported "bug".)
Therefore, I could sort my emails using hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
as recipient (unless someone sends emails to the list in "Bcc").
I still think the proposed change to the mail subject is not a good
idea, as it will break things for more people than it fixes. For
example, as already pointed out, Eero's delivery problems happened with
emails where the subject was not modified anyway.
Currently I don't see issues, i.e. it was something temporary at my ISP
side.
- Eero