Re: [hatari-devel] which version of emutos for next Hatari ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] which version of emutos for next Hatari ?
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 09:46:24 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1651916787; bh=maZMARHUZCoetpKmSgxdDAhz1xNzEohIT1IJNu8rXwM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ZwL89eDxd09wUcgfmzqC8IMjaRv6izUpbMUlaWqNMhGQSA1rqBSpu109djzAJ/N8W nU/ZMVfcse3M7pGyKwfH3U3f0mZdmff414nnJaOgIGdZEZ+73vVyOSTYNm0/oex0ON FRdNuh4ss1PCAXLtcr9mE4fkga8klTM08zjyiG2c0SOPA2ZDy/cyteO2NaRIDqEZHR fgvKdAGa7xAycgQ2f4eHEja1jKRu6duO2t/ophgEMJST+AuIvJf4iQHfKYOzPqTw2j kLMPV+siYqx6eW2MB9Nzn+6YfbXIfWstMODgOLQgw3MgwlS6XmPzimivHwaEnJSUnc MdFHsOyaYRg0g==
Am Sat, 7 May 2022 10:35:46 +0200
schrieb Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>:
> Nicolas Pomarède schrieb:
>
> > for a next EmuTOS version, could there be a way to choose language from
> > the boot screen too ? This would make it easier for people using stf/ste
> > mode where there's no nvram to choose a different language from english
> > at boot.
>
> Funny, I intended to ask *you* a similar question in my previous mail --
> but I forgot to include it.
>
> Could a future Hatari release offer a way to choose the language via its
> configuration options?
>
> Basically, the 1024k ROM is an "emulator-only" version of EmuTOS [1], as
> no Atari machine supports 1024k ROMs. And we created this multi-language
> ROM mainly for the benefit of emulators not having to ship N different
> language versions.
>
> Anyway, I'm Cc'ing your question to the EmuTOS list, since I'm not sure
> if EmuTOS would even support a language change at runtime. As soon as
> the boot screen is shown, one language has obviously already been selected.
I think the best way would be to patch the ROM header of EmuTOS in Hatari
according to the LANG environment variable. IIRC EmuTOS honors the language
setting in the ROM header, too, so that would be an easy solution as far as
I can tell.
Thomas