| Re: [hatari-devel] An issue with a demo "We Were @" by Oxygene |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] An issue with a demo "We Were @" by Oxygene
- From: Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:14:14 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1612970055; bh=c7VGpiPL9iznkDL7mSwwSwgESDNzQpunduUgJSpv0e0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BfzmG5EjQWnWtPjaxJRJPO0BWsz6Kpts1fIra9vM+IvfUwa7r3BgSR+wxhYS8nfgR NGCyCr8aoG+D4DKiNYIzbEviEk78YDQJKJAzAFwzzfUBneUwpMM3AZAXGYNY63Q1Qx zzzcEjcv21QSpUAjuGYW9T/Fi69q4P1jqqkvclrc=
Cyprian Konador schrieb:
I've just checked 2.2.0 and that issue is still present there for both
RAM configurations.
Attached you can find my configuration files and some screenshots for
2MB and 4MB RAM size
I think it was not clear to Nicolas that you were using the harddisk
version of that demo, i.e., WeWereHD.prg, under GEMDOS emulation. With
that, I can reproduce your report.
--trace gemdos shows:
WARN : PREVENTED: program 0x0 accessing program 0x124d8 file handle 0.
I assume that the HD loader for that demo completely takes over memory
and therefore this safeguard (that checks against the current PD) fails:
https://git.tuxfamily.org/hatari/hatari.git/tree/src/gemdos.c#n1049
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - czietz@xxxxxxx
WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
PGP/GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x52CB97F66DA025CA / 0x6DA025CA