| Re: [hatari-devel] readline ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] readline ?
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:57:04 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1607806625; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:From:Subject: Sender; bh=FbIDZodMhIhrlLIKDexXn5r8abrTkyuCDJpSTEWy5Gg=; b=NOTLnwjmKdtLcTKoe3KOLfpNo5j1U/vHfIrAR8nnTHuzbIEeUovh4jX2FEcYMX39ro +8xXeXccDPkI3/Ulu99+nPXLQTABTJZZfV43D36efvf5tmrrmDfPj8VwsuVHdkeUcfut PVgOUXHVgXJxWMWk7pGSKkwUPWq7nNtJ/ezHBpL5yqO2LIigGOtV9Fqyb7q6RNfZKU+k jWRUhackr4xtp5ezjvcDNJNaSmIdf0cXGWxfackZ0Mf/wDEEl4l1KMnT4Jo8YAQVlXAM ErkQxYjCTGPe6paVzW5i6xRABdgceabikhVKbOTL22mUKoa+5DAwN+pHI9nhRiMxHcT/ VQog==
Hi,
I had the same problem recently, and I had to install several *-dev
packages. I'm afraid I don't know anymore which ones, but I found the
respective package names by googling with the missing header files, e. g.
searching for "ubuntu blabla.h".
Best regards
Uwe
> On 12 Dec 2020 at 20:14, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> > On 12/12/20 6:25 PM, Roger Burrows wrote:
> > > I built 2.3.0 recently and it complained about readline missing (which
> > 2.2.1
> > > didn't). And sure enough I can't edit debugger commands.
> > >
> > > There are a lot of packages with readline in their title, and I do seem to
> > have
> > > a lot installed (but not all). I haven't removed any since I built 2.2.1,
> > and
> > > I don't know enough about cmake to figure out exactly what it might be
> > looking
> > > for. Can someone help?
> >
> > On Debian based system (like Ubuntu) you need
> > "libreadline-dev" package, and on RedHat based
> > ones you need "readline-devel" one.
> >
> > Those should pull in the suitable version of
> > the actual library and its development files.
> >
> OK, mines's Debian-based. I installed libreadline-dev, but it still doesn't
> find the package. I re-cloned git to start from fresh, but still no go.
>
> Roger
>
>
>