| Re: [hatari-devel] 24 bits addressing issue |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] 24 bits addressing issue
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:14:32 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1607670872; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:From:Subject: Sender; bh=4oqnAlSVHRLT2N4FsQOUTToc8ow8zlalOMp+jnSrV1Y=; b=tX7rvnHmtAU5hh7vTAPC3xYk1XJ7FXL5itga8V0sFN43CfT+ZTv2HCwX4HKh0TypkG i7Qi5Qn0gHJLN+jsUFiKgr7fAdNGznAzbkSbBpl4JwnXYhJVCJgF7Z+HfXv7W3yfhfcs rzFiitJBlP5M04vjJcV0oSY+eMYtvzFOTIk6WDXNGNd20K1yMQ77ulqU4lREnugq4dls UVSrMHSZKLl8udovipqCegpFkOCrpxebfASx/RVmsdx+M3jjlIsYpl59V4iVm9hb0f0V ABrDMQbpA5YwMZGlreajvAI5NlxAW3UWWy9bHWfyPmeSV5W34BpivU8RoU+oMpEZ/xR3 /6kA==
Hi,
> Everything is fine. Hatari needs to use 32-bit
> addressing when TT-RAM is used, and it's telling
> that it automatically switched (back) to that.
>
> Would the message be clearer if it would state:
> Automatically enabling 32-addressing to support TT-RAM.
> instead of:
> Enabling 32-addressing for TT-RAM access.
> ?
Yes, I think this would be better. In general, some messages could probably
be more user-friendly by providing more details.
Best regards
Uwe
>
> As to what's shown on console, I think this
> message should be WARNING, not an ERROR.
>
>
> - Eero
>
>