| Re: [hatari-devel] Valid memory amount? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Valid memory amount?
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:58:35 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1605599917; bh=g/zvr1tV8hPmLPo1pBn3DN5qbEq7nO3F636ioQ+GSzY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=adNfaFi65x+PmqZxjGSCN+SpHEPcikQ6ID3YeSmP2tEYotLOm+eHFYk5DfhnlCq51 Z6DtnPUAwvi49+YEgzOicv2QXt9LoLQSTWX037lXZN4ZV2FkNa8oX3aI9I6QoIag82 iPA3C7nYkpkgh49zjSFRTGcnhIK1i2X0xgIMnQre6AU6tOQQFbse0CRxiWCU5x62wa cyb/17qrr9UCrh+eNSBl1u/otWjBI39/AjeVSpK+J8WZWzLJGEGxqNbNlhfYQ8yoa4 NvaPi5rTIr9g0TCtFXWs764jig43l386oNijxptZ6igaFWgBPmPMF0ZcN1G1R/6zcx 9txkalmUqHqew==
Am Wed, 11 Nov 2020 01:12:52 +0200
schrieb Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> While testing with TOS boot checker, I noticed
> that Hatari has earlier allowed 6MB and 12MB of
> RAM to be specified, but doesn't anymore.
The check for the current sizes is basically in place since 2016, see
commit 8defb76044b9124481d18d.
> Is it so that these memory configurations aren't
> physically supported on any of the ST / MegaST /
> STE / MegaSTE / TT / Falcon machines?
Seems so. At least nobody complained until now.
> Btw. 10MB is supported on MegaSTE & TT, but
> not on Falcon. Specific memory amounts are
> enforced (with a warning) only for Falcon though.
> I wonder should they be enforced also for others?
I assume you are talking about the STMemory_CorrectSTRamSize()
function? ... I guess yes, maybe it should be enforced for these
machines, too, but that's certainly a change that should rather wait
until the release has been done.
Thomas