| Re: [hatari-devel] My cross-compiling experience |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] My cross-compiling experience
- From: Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 19:13:42 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1588439623; bh=7INPcKf7oN9ElUqnYk7WBUz/84XzKYy7AoY1cfLLR5w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JHPXbWUwE5oju8JgnGABmeXUDDEifY1VAP57DYUz4KZ7Tn8c2sUZlY97DoEHqyvXF VdRe2UTBnkA7e12R2legWurJhajY16NODol+t4eA+tuviaHRzy91pUrmHTsMftQ30E lyRELK/8gUIg7jEjxnw2/flkMx5Ety80U5nIEtXI=
Thorsten Otto schrieb:
> On Samstag, 2. Mai 2020 10:41:36 CEST Christian Zietz wrote:
>
>> Anyway, after having spent (again) some hours
> BTW, since you are already running linux in a subsystem, why do you
> bother at all cross-compiling hatari to a windows executable? Natively
> compiling it for linux should be much easier. CMake is not really good
> at using cross-compilation environments.
Because to run a Linux version of Hatari I would need to install X under
the Linux subsystem and an X server under Windows. That all can be done,
of course, but it can be avoided by (cross-)compiling a Windows version.
Besides: What's the recommended way of building the Windows version of
Hatari, anyway? Back when I ranted how difficult it was getting it to
build natively on Windows, I was told that cross-compiling under Linux
was the way to go. In contrast, you're saying cross-compilation is "not
really good" when using CMake.
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - czietz@xxxxxxx
WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
PGP/GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x52CB97F66DA025CA / 0x6DA025CA