Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions

Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions
From: Thorsten Otto <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:40:19 +0200

On Montag, 15. April 2019 21:06:36 CEST Toni Wilen wrote:
> It would make no sense to use any other method.

I think it would not even work. For addressing modes like ([a0]) the handler 
cannot tell whether the first or the 2nd indirect access faulted.

References:
- [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions
  - From: Eero Tamminen
- Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions
  - From: Eero Tamminen
- Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions
  - From: Toni Wilen

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions
Next by Date: [hatari-devel] External disassembler and FPU instructions
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] 030 exceptions on auto-increment instructions
Next by thread: [PATCH] Fix SDL errors in lilo.c on ARM and PPC systems

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/