|Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Hatari SCSI Driver patch|
[ Thread Index |
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Hatari SCSI Driver patch
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:25:59 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1445289960; l=958; s=domk; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=VRVSg+Y05/hhSJX+2wv41l4f7LL0WeP/s6mSjWEYi4o=; b=X5XIXsHpxpSdv3+h8TcyFCVaLWf/jNOe+H5Bwow5hv9c6kyHbcM1pc+444VrgMPp1zA 3AO2Ho2Hs6Xpox1NUxjxU2a8v5Fw/TMFM6KYyeUCMgs/2lB5za3fOVPG8RmC8BxZHKRxZ LUF0mg+/GojHU/cKyi3Bc7MgYBsJWul8SQE=
The SCSI Driver itself does not have any influence on the functionality
of Hatari. Only when the TOS stub is started the native SCSI Driver code
Anyway, there are several ways to switch off parts of the functionality,
but only libudev may be something that one might not want to depend on.
On the other hand, I wonder whether any Linux distribution runs without it.
> Le 19/10/2015 21:54, Uwe Seimet a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >> The options how Uwe will add the media detection are:
> >> 1. Don't build NF scsidrv support if libudev is missing, or
> >> 2. Disable just media change detection if libudev is missing
> >> Either is fine with me, but 2) would be nicer for the users.
> > Yes, that's the idea. I fully agree.
> as a 3rd option, maybe a parameter could be added to configure / cmake
> in order to disable scsidriver, even if libudev is found ?