| Re: [hatari-devel] Atari TT emulation and SCSI/Atari SysV Unix |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Atari TT emulation and SCSI/Atari SysV Unix
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:36 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1439323176; l=2408; s=domk; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=fotc8Sn8v1m2MQuyplOzhiumZ+9LzWVONYMvgnCHxnY=; b=UsEIvNGI2EMY1q3BwGHc1e65+W1detEJPdFzBdJjgfEtD7Mcs7H7Oi87jaR3pM8bnqX GhwKLf/lEECICdSQh3FVWUhr0wrvSccYbytnQMyDOTvkpG+rKDb/mbTh8ZE5g1j/TQ1R+ a0Bg9fN79wzBTxslJNPoXrhOAv0oThO6GNs=
Hi,
One more thing: Both Linux-68K (at least the early Debian distributions)
and ASV support the Riebel network card (VME). So in the ideal case Hatari
would emulate the VME bus and a Riebel card. Probably very hard to do, but
great for everybody looking for challenging emulations.
Take care
Uwe
> Hi,
>
> Yes, changes getting Linux-68K running are higher than getting the Atari
> SVR4 running. The latter is mainly interesting for historic purposes
> anyway, but it's less powerful then Linux-68K. But at the time it was
> released (1990, actually to developers only), there was no Linux for the
> Atari yet. Together with Solaris it was actually one of the very first
> SVR4 implementations at all.
> And, by the way, it has never been free software. I paid about 4000 DM
> for it. Guess I'm one of the very few who even has an original manual ;-).
>
> Take care
>
> Uwe
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In that case either m68k NetBSD or Linux might be
> > better first step in testing how well real Unix
> > works on Hatari.
> >
> > And somebody could also check that MiNT works
> > with Hatari also when memory protection is
> > enabled...
> >
> >
> > - Eero
> >
> > On tiistai 11 elokuu 2015, Uwe Seimet wrote:
> > > No, Atari's SVR4 only runs on the TT. And the X11 distributed with it
> > > only supports the TT high resolution. ACSI is not supported. This is
> > > most likely because ACSI/DMA cannot directly access TT RAM. You
> > > definitely should have TT RAM, though, because Unix requires much more
> > > resources than TOS.
> > >
> > > Take care
> > >
> > > Uwe
> > >
> > > > On tiistai 11 elokuu 2015, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > > On 10/08/15 20:57, Alex Madama wrote:
> > > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > > > I was looking through the hdc.c code and noticed a bit of SCSI
> > > > > > stuff besides the ACSI.
> > > > > > Is full TT SCSI possible? And if so, can Hatari run Atari SysV
> > > > > > Unix?
> > > > >
> > > > > No, SCSI is not working yet, and no, nobody ever tried to run SysV on
> > > > > Hatari yet. There's likely a lot of things left to fix and implement
> > > > > before that can be run (e.g. the second MFP of the TT emulation is
> > > > > still missing).
> > > >
> > > > Does Atari SysV Unix work on Falcon/IDE?
> > > > Emulation for Falcon is more complete than for TT.
> > > >
> > > > - Eero
> >
> >
> >
>
>