Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
From: Douglas Little <doug694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 22:17:34 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YulZ22SBi98Jv2sMustbA9PnoQDrf7a6eaBzXZMugkY=; b=uHgtJlosh+yUp/+0fi/ugFERVXU9cJc+AKsoI0dIhpGXsFX071UzeSj/IUbhkXVlPx aga7hhSbDFxtSxFhF4Brk5oKkEEMiqcv/+mFA4gMfvO2CcpmE7rxD50an0YELuOBnkvj oq3/Bcy0uz3J1JMNOyh/CbUng4nelnmTkUAqImoge2fe52A8aPHqE3b72VwW0b3w8spo p5PvvaxE2acwlOAvAsZ1n1wjGkK2OPTRnwg4qRHt5kQJbE+dl9yTQDMYlIwXiOTPMtfJ DzJBrW5Pk5f1dyXKgVi8YVyxBTCnD01UNPDa0IjaOiXYvPCReSn+H9bapBpjQ1N75uh/ l33w==

Douglas, have you seen anything funny related to SR,
when using NatFeats?

Not that I have noticed - although SR accidents with the low byte would mainly affect condition codes, which are pretty context sensitive and 68k sets these continuously anyway.

If the upper byte is wrong though it would probably show up pretty quickly.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède

References:
- [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède
- Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
  - From: Eero Tamminen
- Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède
- Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
  - From: Eero Tamminen

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
Next by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code
Next by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] question about natfeats' code

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/