Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Hatari floppy drive detection with EmuTOS |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Hatari floppy drive detection with EmuTOS
- From: David Savinkoff <dsavnkff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:25:44 -0700 (MST)
- Thread-index: JQtsyGeq2fEdlOmMBs1oRlb/snRWxw==
- Thread-topic: Hatari floppy drive detection with EmuTOS
----- Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
> Le 16/01/2014 01:09, David Savinkoff a écrit :
> >> Note that to detect index pulses you normally need one drive, but also
> >> one floppy in it.
> >
> > On 3.5" drives, the index is in the drive. Thus, no floppy is required.
> >
> >
>
> Are you sure of that, do you have some tech doc on this, datasheet for a
> particular model ?
>
> This would explain a lot of things, but I think I read on the contrary
> that many drives (not 3.5'') had internal index, while the 3.5'' relied
> on the one present on the floppy (and as far as I understand their code,
> the IPF library that emulates the WD1772 also assumes index on the floppy)
>
> Nicolas
>
I recently disassembled my SF354 and also a modern Samsung and also saw
a picture on atari-forum. None require a floppy inserted because the sensor
is beside the motor. It doubt any 3.5" drives rely on a floppy disk to be
present.
David