Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari/EmuTOS Conflict

["Roger Burrows" <rfburrows@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Nicholas,
On 11 Jun 2013 at 1:03, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
>
> But there's a problem in Emutos : we can see it still sends 0x1a and
> 0x12 *during* the reset, which is not correct, it should send them after
> getting a 0xf0 or 0xf1 from the ikbd.
>
> in emutos bios/acia.c :
>
>      ikbd_version = ikbd_readb(); /* Usually 0xf1, or 0xf0 for antique
> STs */
>
> ikbd_read doesn't seem to wait for RDRF bit in sr, bytes 0x1a is sent
> just after 0x80 0x01 (reset).
>
> Is this version of Emutos CVS really compiled with CONF_WITH_IKBD_ACIA ?
> I have the feeling ikbd_readb() returns immediatly without waiting.
>
> Vincent do you know anything about this ?
>
> Maybe this line should be enabled :
>
> 560	#if DBG_KBD
> 561	    kprintf("ikbd_version = 0x%02x\n", ikbd_version);
> 562	#endif
>
> To see if emutos really received 0xf1 or 0xf0, or bypassed the test.
>
If it would help, I can compile the CVS with that debugging code turned on and
send you a copy for testing.

Roger Burrows