Re: [hatari-devel] Code execution discontinuities and detecting them? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
Hi,
On tiistai 26 helmikuu 2013, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
> Regarding your function cpu_opcode_type(), I think that instead of
> masking opcodes yourself you should use OpcodeFamily (which is updated
> for each instruction, see cpuemu.c) with the constants instrmnem defined
> in readcpu.h
>
> You should get the same results, and this will leave the family's
> classification to the cpu emulation part instead of duplicating it
> partly in your code.
I didn't know about that, thanks, I will use it. It will make
code also more readable. :-)
I noticed that there's CHK2 in addition to CHK, is that for
CPUs > 68000?
- Eero