| Re: [hatari-devel] Problem with Hatari 1.6.2 and EmuTOS 192K ROMs |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Problem with Hatari 1.6.2 and EmuTOS 192K ROMs
- From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:07:46 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NCt68XSOAvBd/aVNjBFHuBOaBVePen77p8jlypVTZ1I=; b=DHp5ardJG//UXhdEKo8rN/p4mEhKw5DJ0K3MSdvx5evWQbNaQm2JasBASZs9SgMX+S pYx6A34rwhqKc5JujTL/rN2/kGGw8WoAKQOiaE8+Sh/70zqoce2GyIfBCjIdhS2Z/LX0 6ql+1/0Efj0oYNK0QYS1TPgilTznhtWTIXecmdV4oYPL64noJ18y0fzrPHLpyJpzXK0+ u0Y7e2emTAEDDV2lxeCjfHrn3e3pdsB+azWid81ujGlloKVkm1GLCv88WJGBzEjn0GG1 Rv6542dVcr6vv5qP2HEhD8VU+K8c2sJN0671pWJs2ji/sCHk0C4wp51+MS3pg9G74bWb m3uQ==
On 12/10/2012 22:48, Eero Tamminen wrote:
Does EmuTOS call IKBD_Cmd_SetClock() before IKBD_Cmd_ReadClock()
with some wierd value?
Very possible.
When there is no NVRAM or Mega ST clock, EmuTOS assumes that there is only
the IKBD clock, which is not battery backed up.
So as a default, it initializes the IKBD clock with the ROM build date, at
00:00:00.
IMHO EmuTOS should set the date only if the IKBD date is not set, but I
don't know how to detect that.
Anyway, Hatari should not crash.
Isn't Cygwin supposed to implement POSIX whereas MinGW is
wrapper around Windows libraries?
Yes. This is an example.
Vincent