Very seldom!
Your idea is acceptable: a normal user has no need of code.
Il 15/mag/2015 13:34, "Maïeul Rouquette" <maieul@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
for now, I have no opinion. But as the aim of reledmac is to avoid direct modification of package code by user, only advanced user should read the code handbook, isn't ?
in other word: in which case as user do you need to read the code handbook?
Le 15 mai 2015 à 13:05, Domenico Cufalo <cufalo@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Dear Maieul,
No problem for me, although I'd prefer to have one handbook splitted in two distinct parts.
Go ahead as you think is better! ;-)
2015-05-15 11:23 GMT+02:00 Maïeul Rouquette <maieul@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Dear users,
for now the handbook of eledmac/eledpar has two part:
1) One is the user handbook
2) The other one is the code documentation.
One of my invisible work since four year (yes, four year I maintain (e)ledmac!) is to split what is relevant of user and what is relevant of dev. In other words, it is to create more and more "hight level" command for user in order to let stable the low level user and to prevent the need of \renewcommand.
The reledmac project have to aim to finish this split. That is: reledmac users should not matter with the code of reledmac. Consequently, it should be better to split the handbook in two pdf:
- one will be the user handbook
- the other one will be the code handbook.
What do you thing about this?
Maïeul
ps : I am still waiting feedback about the reledmac project.
--
Prof. Domenico Cufalo
Via Contessa Matilde 14
56123 Pisa (PI)
Home: +390509662639
Mobile: +393475207746
E-Mail - WebSite