Re: [eigen] Date for the actual relicensing: Wednesday?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]


a EIGEN_MPL2_ONLY option does not harm, so it's ok to me. Currently it
concerns two files (entirely):


and so the two respective modules:


which are currently made of single files. I still hope to get a
positive answer from Tim Davis though.


On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I plan to do this tomorrow.
> Gael: ping about the first email in this thread. Do you agree with
> EIGEN_MPL2_ONLY? What is the 3rdparty code that we have to put behind
> Let's aim to complete the relicensing by Friday!
> Benoit
> 2012/7/11 Keir Mierle <mierle@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Attached is a patch to add a relicensing script. The next patch will be a
>> first-run of the script for review (e.g. figure out what files need
>> exclusions). Benoit, do you want to commit this?
>> Keir
>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Can we agree to do the actual relicensing on Wednesday this week?
>>> This means that:
>>>  1.we will arbitrarily decide that we have enough contributor
>>> agreements and ignore the remaining ones. In fact, I believe that we
>>> have enough already: with the only exception of Ken Riddile, all other
>>> missing contributors have contributed at most 2 patches each.
>>>  2. we will have to deal with 3rdparty LGPL code for which we do not
>>> have agreement to relicense. IIUC (Gael is tracking this) currently
>>> that's 2 pieces used in the Sparse module. Maybe we should have a
>>> EIGEN_MPL2_ONLY option. Up to Gael.
>>>  3. we need to have the relicensing scripts (replacing license headers
>>> while keeping copyright lines) ready. Keir are you taking care of
>>> that?
>>> Cheers,
>>> Benoit

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+