| Re: [eigen] Spline Fitting |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Spline Fitting
- From: Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:21:32 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=574juVCd9UA4v2pNqZuwxqv6kQXxlrdMXpxek5bkHvg=; b=iP4uSxvtaXSSNEy4hhPs27BxPqX40UAWrmI/BkeyjYJGLk/KmmqiTI7hkpxKW+8AFZ brDUNvD1OWS4N1oOlXRR5yshfae0EaEM6bTr/bRKPRn+XlCmA8ebb0inRgCOvACTmm1l uXtuq/vcfUfor+nuvwgsX8C3ZOcS+BLKCc4QMgdz1sIjdceW4mFxY5pUdVEYW5Kz/VaK Ilz4nnbPqBkkAR7ddlplyinK6e6rmxdxlYH08mcVx4nOmm07N+gzTlmp7t0csyV7Gqy6 hYts0fDRIWfluYJDABuiEKhqlYqi8OZMorp+Zrus9/hwRoRGZraPNfTL7358NtmjIqwA jMxg==
Hi Class,
I pushed your suggestion to the current development branch. There is
now a second fitting function which allows you to provide the knot
parameters.
Thanks for trying out the module and for the feedback. Feel free to
get back when you encounter other issues or possibilities for
improvement.
Regrads,
Hauke
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:10 AM, "Claas H. Köhler"
<claas.koehler@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just took a look at the unsupported Spline module, which seems to have a lot of potential. Taking a
> look at the examples in the test rountines, I was wondering, whether it is mandatory to re-calculate
> the chord lengths after a spline has been fitted to the data (this is the way it is done in the
> examples).
>
> As far as I understand, cord lenghts are needed to evaluate the spline at a defined node. So would it
> be useful to maybe pass the cord lengths vector to the SplineFitting::Interpolate as parameter
> instead of creating a temporary there? This way the user could access them after the spline has been
> created.
>
> Regards
> Claas
>
>
>