| [eigen] Re: Scheduling beta3 on sunday february 6 ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [eigen] Re: Scheduling beta3 on sunday february 6 ?
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:43:15 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qgkOs8y6J82OJduccZh+yErxaFfCDbNDo//YWfdHCKQ=; b=jKVduMeeXmM0nXuwr2e+wqxUZEX+LM++4QpDWTBwA9rjHWJaHUhF7D+OW6JCEirBoN w6WYHlqW/gzCBkHvq+fee8AkvUHvKhL1OgZ4Mxp48XAoQLVN61OlT/YgfCUW7Fgc0pek oVmc8KVsI22zvrSvfJcYuDPa/321E4xVg2Ljo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J6GZRfSkH1CM/1JuK1uUdFe+mYtP4RK+Ltsb1kvsC/gkW0+QF2olqS/vCtrZ7PW8U8 o9eNUehliVXB0ZL4ET0xFDvKwatvym4NYzfpbrDm/YoSpvM6Nd5XHPCIvAu3cpt2+wyo mtUMYUXXERku2X64g4oeerNV8Votf7SZedn5U=
Hi,
Thanks to everybody's hard work, beta3 already looks much closer today!
http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/bz/showdependencytree.cgi?id=48&hide_resolved=1
51: no malloc in fixed-size products
-> for Gael; see my previous email
52: Strides API
-> for me; see my previous email
53: Sparse - API stability for basic features
-> for Gael; see my previous email
57: Uniform external library support
-> for Gael; see my previous email
73: 3.0-beta2: Intel incomplete type error breaks several unit tests
-> still needs attention
100: Finalize the array-as-scalar feature
-> see my previous email
Benoit
2011/1/26 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> Despite the flurry of improvements currently happening in hg, we still
> need to focus and actually release this beta3 !
>
> Let's schedule it. Do you agree for Sunday February 6 ? That leaves us 10 days.
>
> That means that we have at most one week to finish it. Does that sound
> OK? The blockers are:
>
> http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/bz/showdependencytree.cgi?id=48&hide_resolved=1
>
> 51: no malloc in fixed-size products
>
> Gael, if you don't have time, this can be dropped from beta3 and block
> only final.
>
> 52: Strides API
>
> Will do (if I make API changes there, i'll write to this list very
> soon with my proposal)
>
> 53: Sparse - API stability for basic features
>
> Gael, please decide very soon the fate of Sparse in 3.0! As we
> discussed, even if it's not stable, we dont necessarily have to move
> it to unsupported: it is rather less intrusive to force users to
> #define I_KNOW_THAT_SPARSE_IS_NOT_YET_STABLE.
>
> 57: Uniform external library support
>
> Gael -> if Sparse isn't stable in 3.0, then this is no longer a blocker.
>
> 59: Clean up FullPivHouseholderQR
>
> Will do very soon.
>
> 73: 3.0-beta2: Intel incomplete type error breaks several unit tests
>
> This one needs attention. Can anyone install ICC and have a look?
>
> 100: Finalize the array-as-scalar feature [See dependency tree
> for bug 100]
>
> Shouldn't we just make this a 3.1 feature at this point? How does it
> affect existing API?
>
> 131: Unaligned Quaternions/Transformations
>
> Need to have a look at this. I think it was added recently.
>
> 148: array-matrix transpose product does not compile
>
> Same.
>
> Benoit
>