| Re: [eigen] geometry module |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] geometry module
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:02:44 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GUYgo8UIqs+dvPg/gAeojSZeyHa3Zwd/oiwjBnrxOg0=; b=aaLQHUxro2CjbnL2bEi5IIhB+vt1tctglPAvoUAtKH0KuITiyUXd+ij27zNX4ICJPL V8dX4wb1V26xZrY9wxB6YNQX6WXiTODEkSrEKGHHypJCeKHJjxGialehV1959oTg0cy1 ESWte6g6xnw7D4PftqVLT9DDrXVqb1hGWYfiE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=x5aCmIbZ58MEvuTTrkoEQ9ftlVGHDp5YnGhLQZablYaiIlf39bheLPB4Ocz8x3QA/5 9AOqLaQ3WWfiH/4GXMKL2Z50CuSyTe8NLqJL2CltsM5xmqf1LOopppCSfC5e3wuVI/lR V26fVhqXB40jdRYtPsIGtFiCez8BiTemodEg8=
> By the way --- others: shouldn't Isometry be CompactAffine instead of
> Affine? Or should there be a CompactIsometry, etc.
=> we should add a CompactIsometry, I remember we already agreed on
that, but this has not been done yet.
> So that makes me think that I'm not sure how much I like the name
> Rotation2D for that. How about Angle2D instead? Would be consistent
> with AngleAxis.
Why not, it is indeed consistent with AngleAxis. That also makes me
think Rotation2D::slerp is bugged since it naively interpolate the
angles....
gael