Re: [eigen] legal question |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] legal question
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:34:26 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B7C3tqQjqKBo9BMhU6VJ1blvzj/TghA8wLFqAIVmShU=; b=v8yOSQBHugVLBukSNnRMZTHns7jSHJzeaTYY0rOnjUnPrPW5HFLbxdgNg+MX5IYsai ZGSpjuW8S08Q4G7S4xPCs90SSfpWOBR2znr6eH06s+qrJCuIM1gBP4O9q3EJt7djUhjz U/WDUREY96Vh7IyD1H2qFGNb0oNeB/4YvMxKY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vRYOnGcPG8tRdNMJo8J+iRRq84eBSeoym276btOo43iCwYXrA1pT45N2Xq3979eg+N cPO0mE0h8OBhQbudkSNdHV4Xe2+0hXhCkgSUWIDEmSTg4cZVEU+RrPF2dRG521HXFQh3 PUqkIp9VWTBwxcSRat187pRFV3RNl3b3ta7z4=
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2010/8/3 Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa@xxxxxxx>:
>> On 08/ 3/10 10:58 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you mean the doxygen-generated class docs? What is the problem with
>>> CC-BY on them?
>>>
>>> Also, isn't it better to have a single license governing all our docs,
>>> so that e.g. an archive of all our docs would be governed by a single
>>> license?
>>>
>>> Benoit
>>
>> Hi Benoit:
>>
>> Having worked on several FOSS projects, it seems that one license is best,
>> especially for things like snippets which have already been brought
>> up in this thread. By the way, I must have missed it, but was there
>> some reason that MIT or BSD licenses were not considered?
>
> No particular reason: it felt natural to consider CC for docs, but you
> seem to be right: there is no problem about releasing docs under
> MIT/BSD license, is there?
>
> That would be a nice choice, because if we choose a very liberal
> license for our docs for the sake of simplicity, then nothing beats
> MIT/BSD in this respect.
yes the MIT license seems to be well appropriate here.
gael
>
> Benoit
>
>>
>> --
>> Rodney Sparapani Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research
>> Sr. Biostatistician http://www.mcw.edu/pcor
>> 4 wheels good, 2 wheels better! Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW)
>> WWLD?: What Would Lombardi Do? Milwaukee, WI, USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>