Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex*From*: Joel Falcou <joel.falcou@xxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:28:58 +0200

On 20/07/10 16:26, Gael Guennebaud wrote:

Yes it clearly simplify the vectorization of products but for the rest I'm not sure (but who cares about the rest ?). It is also to be compatible with BLAS/LAPACK.

Well, other operators are done elementwise w/r to the real/imag part. Other functions however have the same decomposition than *

hm, BLAS/LAPACK use the fortran COMPLEX type with interleaved real and imaginary part. Did I miss something?

Sorry, I thought Matlab and wrote LAPACK

**References**:**[eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*FMDSPAM

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Joel Falcou

**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] An insistent plea for an input operator** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] vectorization of complex**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |