| Re: [eigen] refactoring fork: some news |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] refactoring fork: some news
- From: Manuel Yguel <manuel.yguel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:04:03 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=joidTWkDD2dvxXfdhlyBLQUbgOdH230s7a1mRSULriQ=; b=MEipmGVP6bmwkxrJuAmRed9cceEhvz1iYMhzkaEiOLd452iNZjA6pNVH84Lwsd1BWy urSpJ631ll5rto5DnrOHANfOYwdV2tmXr9N+GSD+CLkIn5pxr+jzApQ989SkUXNV8Dtt 0gPtAPnd0dWii/nb05V3IsjS0tTq+mgfk73S4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=XVlW5/F07pe3FI36p+9He/4QvbmiM/OVPbzrrcYD2+mwVFbtOTB30DLDsNbMYhSkRi bcjQlTucu2R9myRGz9bIyNvO5v8rcTQRjQ43L25vGZ2IbV+1t+f1l5qhBL89fb9PrEka 2dPDUzwa7sJ8bbQuh9AniDIOpX0X0s9G1QWcU=
Hi,
I am practically sure that it is off the point however my concern is
that in some applications, it is necessary to view a matrix of size
nxm as a vector 1xnm or pxq with nm = pq.
I wonder if this is the good moment to raise my case, but is this
possible to consider having a matrix() function that takes two
parameters that are compatible with the number of coefficients in the
array: matrix(int rows, int cols ) with rows*cols = size()
such that we can have for a 3x4 matrix, a 12x1 vector or a 2x6 matrix
or a 4x3 matrix etc... assuming that the coefficients are given by the
storage order row major or column major.
- sincerely,
Manuel