Re: [eigen] compilation failed for not aligned tiny matrix

[WANG Xuewen <xuewen.wang@xxxxxxxxx>]

Benoit Jacob wrote:
> 2009/10/6 WANG Xuewen <xuewen.wang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>   
> > Gael Guennebaud wrote:
> >     
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > ok, here the bug is that computeInverse() expect a PlainMatrixType which
> > > in your case is equivalent to TinyRMatrix but without the DontAlign option.
> > > Yes that's a bug in Eigen.
> > >
> > > But now, I'm wondering why computeInverse is not a template function ?
> > > Think about submatrices, or, e.g., to perform:
> > > m.transpose().computeInverse(inv); - here m.transpose() is row major and so
> > > computeInverse will expect a row major matrix.
> > >
> > > Moreover I'm wondering whether computeInverse() is still useful since we
> > > can make inv = a.inverse() works in place just like compute inverse.
> > >
> > >       
> > Ah, I didn't try directly inverse() and it does work so I'll change my code
> > to use inverse. thanks!
> >     
>
> This change (making inverse() work in place) isn't implemented yet!
> You can use inverse() already but it'll be a few weeks before this is
> as efficient as computeInverse.
>
>
>   
It seems that computeInverse is fixed now so I'll use it. Look forward 
to have inverse() work in place. Thank you for the work!

Xuewen