Re: [eigen] backporting the vectorized quaternion product to 2.0 ?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have users (at Celestia) who are very interested in the performance
> gain from Rohit's vectorized quaternion product, and are considering
> backporting it themselves.
>
> I'm OK personnally to backporting it to 2.0, I can do it, i'd just
> like to know if anybody has a strong feeling against doing that, or if
> there's a big technical difficulty there.
>
> Rationale:
> 1) it's not dangerous as long as it's covered by a unit test
> 2) it's a cool feature and as the next major version takes a long time
> to prepare, it's nice to backport some cool features.
>
> Benoit
>
>
>

ok for me.

gael



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/