Re: [eigen] git

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

I agree with this. I think we need a kind of 'validation' from main 
developers. i'm not sure who they are, but at least Gael and Benoit according 
to the activity graph. I did not mention it yet, did I ? Here's an example This is provided by a mercurial extension 
i wrote, it is based on the number of commits and only means .. well, not more 
than just that.

I guess the original setup would be an 'official' repository where only few 
people could push. I propose that we setup this repository on bitbucket, and 
the developers plays with it, pulling and pushing to learn how it works. 
Meanwhile, the official repository would still be the kde svn of course.

If/once validated it would be easy to do another conversion from scratch, 
after applying a tag in svn to know where this happened, and switch the 
official repository.

I can help with that and the wiki documentation. I'm a happy eigen user, but I 
do not modify it and as such can not provide much code back. 


On Saturday 02 May 2009 09:01:32 Gael Guennebaud wrote:
> However, before we make a final decision I would like we establish a
> workflow with associated hg commands to be sure the hg way to work is
> ok for us (I know hg is not very flexible to that respect in contrast
> to bzr for instance). Since I don't know hg yet, I cannot start that
> right now, but I'll start learning it and fill a section of the
> Developer's corner wiki page.

Thomas Capricelli <orzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+