| Re: [eigen] [PATCH] solving the transposed/adjoint problem with SuperLU |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] [PATCH] solving the transposed/adjoint problem with SuperLU
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:55:17 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YyF+I+XQfY6JWS1mHr6UEGWJbtwZWx5jmSXbikWNYZQ=; b=nfkkpwlW6XWwuJXdLGNHiukfr4AVPsZi3jVVFYBoNPzVUTU30VsaR7l6UfbG064Ing L3tYK9UJ293Ae0XtmBfIHSAk62AGnTvAFSXFMZlgBPqmb/RRpEjJux66JPiDBvPWd3TT buG2Uo1RcGfxPOIU0A3fcc2LDsf5U5/nN7G44=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mSzcwW1yOTWYmoIhAKb7B9hpYZnxjluufjebn1SfWzHag59BK0tixDrYTm7AT7/7zX 8zjyvyAkeQTw48sYMcHI+XDYM6zgd3nPAU2pCT6OFv01oF1f/r7588SVPjolrs4RwlVK OTsQ8Kalwmp88sn0rmDmfZEFGUk1cJ7LY6k8s=
ok, patch applied
cheers,
gael
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Gael Guennebaud
<gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
>
> thanks for your effort, but I really have no time for Eigen now. but
> don't worry, I'll get back to you when I'll have more time :)
>
> gael.
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Moritz Lenz
> <mlenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>> first), and when I uncomment the test for the adjoint solving, I get a
>>> segmentation fault
>>
>> I investigated a bit more, it's the m2.adjoint() that segfaults - and I
>> claim innocence on this one, becaue I don't touch m2 for writing anywhere.
>>
>> So what are your thoughts about this patch? Do I need to improve
>> anything before it can be applied?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Moritz
>>
>> --
>> Moritz Lenz
>> http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
>>
>>
>>
>