| Re: [eigen] patch for tridiagonal matrices in eigen |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] patch for tridiagonal matrices in eigen
- From: "Benoit Jacob" <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:25:49 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WZ2Y25UMZ79EcZjGQ9NG1zb1q54Wpg9gzyQbVnBMNoo=; b=Yq7oPBCveAO+aFvKouBxegNqffuZ0hL1+qE8nXeBOXT8Nr5iQjJw7BcS/4IF2vkNi0 geZ/5+2xi5cGNMK84Co8HUZA+bUYQYFuntcumVEeviSp0v4VBWDHECstjaP4P4GuxGQ3 gqjezCL8pj93d6no66678ROlDWJ9qtrxL/UVg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=pk2gtVvU8o+xz66m66DZJwyRWWNwy7eBhYvDkuJkeTl8hrRcTlVKukquEZhWNrZWWV 30TmUQjikgY0mXeb5MLUoFFJ3tCRn0T67/uCGa5FMuoM+v5+lM6uPWEXG/jYXSvNOqjJ pqI1+Dzs0iOXCs6mLbv+cjYsyxoBCBgh0zLyc=
2008/12/19 Mauro Iazzi <mauro.iazzi@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I do not understand properly the meaning of these flags. For example
> part needs assumes some to be exclusive but not others (i.e.
> UpperTriangular is not UpperHessenberg, but StrictlyUpper is
> UpperTridiagonal...). If part() checked using == instead of & I think
> it would be safe to use the Flags to mark the type of the matrix (it
> already does in some points).
Hm, good remark.
It seems that the current design, whcih worked quite well do far, does
not scale very well.
Maybe indeed it's time to start using exclusive flags and == instead of &.
Cheers,
Benoit
---