Re: [eigen] copyright / license question

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On Monday 03 November 2008 16:23:12 Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2008, Benoît Jacob wrote:
> > Ah ok sure, if it's "LGPL 2.1+" then in particular it's "LGPL 3+". I
> > didn't know that one could freely relicense from LGPL to GPL, I
> > understand that makes sense.
> That's what makes LGPL compatible with GPL ;)

Hum wait, being "compatible" doesn't mean "allow to relicense", for example 
BSD is GPL-compatible but one can't relicense from BSD to GPL (see e.g. the 
fuss that happened when a linux driver developer mistakenly relicensed 
OpenBSD code to GPL in a wifi driver).



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+