Re: [AD] What to call the new branch?

[Peter Hull <peterhull90@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Aren't there some features of Github that work better (or more smoothly at least) if the main branch is called 'master'?

On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 at 22:15 SiegeLord <siegelordex@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So once 5.2 is released, it won't make sense to develop on the 5.1
branch anymore. Since we'll have to make a new branch anyway, any
opinions on what to call it? The two logical options are:

5.2 - this would just follow the usual pattern. As per the unstable API
proposal, there won't be a 5.3 branch to go with it.

master - this is somewhat more typical of git projects

I don't care either way, but since we have this opportunity, I figured
I'd ask.

-SL

_______________________________________________
Allegro-developers mailing list
Allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers