| [AD] What to call the new branch? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [AD] What to call the new branch?
- From: SiegeLord <siegelordex@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:15:11 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h1FZUKXQU+I+KxppTMBbXYFRxaLSu9hnYt2sQfFGPHU=; b=oy4PuTlQ+k70Ck6FlJlXTtEOfySDT7E5p+/uJpXnTSNNBe8SdMjCi2aTeokPly4Dfd r0bMgDqAqm2whMto7+S1ZoqPkEpRjlzfgOX8oFR3mbRQvFL+4Vf+Jck8flICTJnG+62u +1iFVHVs5ZZ7gXoC7QoPl3edHmHmDKa7RtTAuyaGCGlTwxybx95gH3B2VQkGI66d8QiA /lhOsP1WwIS9W5OQr54u7MbVLOHjFnAgYNL53414pG9f5aH4ChUQvlbIMUdRXeWdl/M4 Hh++eTFc412JKRC8RkEkeg91b44h8PaJHdDQF765ZEm5YSQvgHUaLSkdZlm75HTS4cud o+tQ==
So once 5.2 is released, it won't make sense to develop on the 5.1
branch anymore. Since we'll have to make a new branch anyway, any
opinions on what to call it? The two logical options are:
5.2 - this would just follow the usual pattern. As per the unstable API
proposal, there won't be a 5.3 branch to go with it.
master - this is somewhat more typical of git projects
I don't care either way, but since we have this opportunity, I figured
I'd ask.
-SL