Re: [AD] Patch: improved website stylesheet

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Trent Gamblin <trent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, April 28, 2014 4:29 am, Elias Pschernig wrote:
>> About Windows dependencies, it seems msys2 has a package manager which
>> has binaries for all dependencies (as well as allegro itself):
>> https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages
>>
>> So at least when using mingw64 to compile, this should make a Windows
>> build extra easy.
>
> Do things in order. Get CMake able to build proper binaries before setting
> up VMs and compilers. 64 bit binaries aren't as important as 32 bit. I'm
> just looking at this horrible non-existant game plan here and cringing.

mingw64 is a compiler for 32 as well as 64 bit, the old mingw32 (which
is 32-bit only) just isn't really developed much right now. Also,
32-bit binaries are limited to around 2GB of RAM. But again, the
reason for mingw64 is just that it's the most maintained fork right
now.

And I agree, we unfortunately will need some cmake improvements along
the way. But the current build mostly is able to build binaries - so I
think we are in fact ready to setup VMs and so on. Which specific
feature of CMake we need for "proper binaries" are you referring to?




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/