Re: [AD] al_d3d_set_release/release_callback

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Yes, now that I think about it they should take the display.

Trent

On 2013-04-21, at 7:09 AM, Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> These would be more consistent with existing naming, though
> I do prefer if we had used the al_<platform>_* convention.
> 
>    al_d3d_set_release_callback -> al_set_d3d_device_release_callback
>    al_d3d_set_restore_callback -> al_set_d3d_device_restore_callback
> 
> Shouldn't both callbacks take the ALLEGRO_DISPLAY which is affected as
> an argument?
> 
> Peter
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
> analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
> apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
> our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
> http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
> -- 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/