| Re: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2011-03-09, Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:08 -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> > Should the count field of TIMER_EVENT be uint64_t instead of int64_t?
> > And a bunch of related functions should change as well.
> >
>
> I'd like to not use unsigned types whenever possible - really annoying
> when you need to convert to signed somewhere :P
The count value may be negative. Currently it only ever
increments by +1, but there's no fundamental reason for that.
Peter