Re: [AD] count field of TIMER

Re: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro Development <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT
From: Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:06:07 +0100

On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:08 -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Should the count field of TIMER_EVENT be uint64_t instead of int64_t?
> And a bunch of related functions should change as well.
> 

I'd like to not use unsigned types whenever possible - really annoying
when you need to convert to signed somewhere :P

-- 
Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT
  - From: Peter Wang

References:
- [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT
  - From: Jon Rafkind

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT
Next by Date: Re: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT
Previous by thread: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT
Next by thread: Re: [AD] count field of TIMER_EVENT

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/