Re: [AD] DO_PARALLELOGRAM_MAP again

[Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2010-09-16, Pavel Sountsov <slabode@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Well, color and memfile addons also consist of one relatively small
> > > file each, so I don't think size alone should decide this. Many 
> high
> > > primitives functions seem to me to be somewhat esoteric utility
> > > functions... you could say that they are to allegro core as libGLU 
> is
> > > to libGL.
> > >
> > > I don't feel too strongly about that, however.
> > >
> >
> > Do you still plan to add polygon triangularization? That would be
> > something which would perfectly fit into the primitives addon again
> > then. Otherwise it would seem like we'd need a separate polygon addon
> > for it.
> >
> > --
> > Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking of. Coupled with 
> al_calculate_* functions it would seem out of place in the core to me.

Okay.

Actually we only need to move the software triangle renderer
(_al_triangle_2d?) to the core.  al_draw_*_bitmap would use that
directly instead of going via al_draw_prim.

Peter