Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:52 +0200, Milan Mimica wrote:
> Elias Pschernig wrote:
> >
> > We do not really have sub-sub-bitmaps right now. If you create a
> > sub-bitmap, this is what happens:
> >
> >
> > if (parent->parent) {
> > x += parent->xofs;
> > y += parent->yofs;
> > parent = parent->parent;
> > }
> >
> > So basically, the parent of a sub bitmap always is a real bitmap.
> >
> > If we want to change this, we will need a function
> > "_al_find_bitmap_parent(bitmap)" which traverses all the parents to find
> > the real one (to be used wherever "bitmap->parent" is used right now).
>
> Or just replace that "if" with a "while".
Here where it's created, yes. But I was talking of the other functions
taking bitmap parameters who will have to be made aware of it :P
--
Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps
- Re: [AD] clipping, sub bitmaps