| Re: [AD] MIN, MAX,... violate namespace |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2009-02-15, Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it ok if I rename them to _ALLEGRO_MIN, _ALLEGRO_MAX and so on and
> move from base.h to aintern.h? I don't think we need to keep them in the
> public API, it's not our job to provide missing C operators :P
Fine by me.
>
> I also wouldn't really care at this point, but I'm trying to use A5 and
> glib together and it doesn't quite work out:
>
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Standard-Macros.html
>
> With A4 I'd have my way by hacking around a bit with #define.. but in A5
> the goal is to have a 100% clean namespace anyway, so I guess it's a
> good excuse to fix it properly right away.
>
> If it seems to make the code unreadable, I could put lines like this on
> top of .c files with extensive use, instead of renaming:
>
> #define MAX _ALLEGRO_MAX
Yes, that's the way to go.
Peter