Re: [AD] fshook changes

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On January 11, 2009, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 08:06 -0700, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > Something new to think about, I'm sure we want large file support on
> > 32bit systems, so at least on linux (and some unixs) we need to use
> > fseeko and ftello instead of the non o versions.
> >
> > they happen to be SUSv2, and POSIX.1-2001, is that enough? I was planning
> > on adding a check in cmake for them, but the allegro api will change
> > depending if they exist or not... fseek/ftell deal with 'long',
> > fseeko/ftello deal with off_t (which is 64bit with the right defines
> > set).
> >
> > So supporting both versions means incompatible dlls...
>
> What about uint64_t like in A4?
>
> http://www.liballeg.org/stabledocs/en//alleg030.html#file_size_ex

I suppose.

> --
> Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It is the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB


-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/