Re: [AD] Plans for Allegro 4.9.5

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 2008-09-13, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Ok, I've been working on it a little tonight, and I wonder, should I rename 
> the vtable stucts to be more like the other ALLEGRO_*_INTERFACE structs?

Sure.

> Also, if you're wondering why I haven't made it all part of the 
> ALLEGRO_SYSTEM_INTERFACE stuff, its mainly because the fshooks need to be setup 
> before the system driver gets initialized, does allegro still load a system 
> driver name from a config file?

Not right now.  Currently there is exactly one system driver per
operating system.  We might need an equivalent of SYSTEM_NONE later.
Also, theoretically, the Linux console port might come back, in which
case we need multiple system drivers.

Something like file system handling, on any one OS, will have the same
implementation no matter what system driver is active, so I think you're
right to separate it from the system driver.

Peter





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/