Re: [AD] 4.2.1 is up, and a version number proposal

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Could be 4.2.1.7599, where the last number is the SVN version. So there
should be no ambiguity between two different releases nor to SVN
snapshots or whatever.

Victor

--- Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> Ron Novy wrote:
> > Why not just add the release date to the end?  I
> > believe all version numbers would look better in UTC
> > format any way. And having a date in them is more
> > usefull when archiving.
> > 4.2.1.2006-11-26, 4.2-06.11.26 or some variant ;)
> 
> Looks much like an unstable SVN snapshot, rather then a stable
> release.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Milan Mimica
> http://sparklet.sf.net
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
> cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> -- 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
> 



		
_______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale 
o discador agora! 
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/