[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 6:17 pm, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 6:07 pm, Peter Wang wrote:
> > On 2006-08-09, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:09 am, Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz wrote:
> > > > On 2006-08-09, Chris Robinson <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > I get single emails and the attachment didn't make it here,
> > > > > either. IIRC, the list is set up to ignore emails with attachments
> > > > > that have any but a few extensions.
> > > >
> > > > Mailman filters out whatever that isn't a multipart/mixed,
> > > > multipart/alternative or text/plain. With regards to extensions,
> > > > only known windows binary extensions are disallowed.
> > >
> > > Actually, I think I posted links to the files, and not an attachment.
> > > http://svn.tomasu.org/repos/vfs/trunk/vfs_proposal.odt
> > > This is plain http accessible, theres no need to use svn to grab it.
> >
> > I'd read that before. It really isn't detailed enough information to
> > understand what you mean by al_set_path_hook(). Please explain, as if
> > you were writing an manual entry.
>
> As you can tell, I'm rather bad at writing "info" or docs.
>
> What I mean is that al_set_path_hook() will be used by addons and allegro
> internally to set the vtable entries for all of the "hooks" needed by
> allegro, and a 3rd party "vfs" (ie: my vfs, physfs, etc) to work together.
>
No objections? Then I'll continue ASAP.
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx