| Re: [AD] Allegro SVN mirrors. |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Sunday 18 June 2006 12:25 am, Peter Wang wrote:
> On 2006-06-17, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > That is, we could of course just stay with SF again now. My personal
> > > impression is, SF is more stable right now than bafserv. Probably both
> > > are about the same really. But, SF has the advantage that we have more
> > > immediate control.
> > >
> > > Or is there any reason to stay at bafserv?
> >
> > I think not...
>
> Me neither. Let's make this official ASAP or it's just confusing.
>
> Peter
Somewhat OT, can I get an on commit hook? instead of mindlessly polling the
svn rsync, I'd like to just get notification.. Thinking of rsyncing an hour
after the last commit (so if theres many commits, it doesn't sync multiple
times).
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx