| Re: [AD] #allegro SVN commit info |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] #allegro SVN commit info
- From: "Ryan Patterson" <cgamesplay@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:33:58 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZC7EsYv5w5+hqa91fFCoy9J27INW2JYPipQnpyDrBzFsE8IZQfvB4VXsC9b7sAwQ0S+Kn9BV2HEE08Pbmopri68L3wuZSxfaVseh2xim+hepK+DYHlVX+yv9e8BdsleSFoHN3cNV8TNUCNpHR6Y2Jy+QGVThCt2SLdjpcE85Xl8=
On 4/11/06, Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Btw., how is the state of AllegroGL's commit messages?
I've contacted Micah Dowty, who runs CIA, and from my perspective we
have 3 options:
1. Have CIA relay the XML message from SF's script to CBotsPlay
2. Have one of the CIA bots join #allegro and have it manage the
commit messages.
3. Have CBotsPlay poll SF's svn repo and detect commits.
At this point I'm not sure which method is better. I don't like #2,
because it feels too "generic", if you know what I mean. I suppose #1
is the best method, I'll just have to find out the format of the
messages. I'll email him this later.
--
Regards,
Ryan Patterson <mailto:cgamesplay@xxxxxxxxxx>